Close Button
Fleetwood Mac - Rumours
Album Comparisons: Rumours
Fleetwood Mac... what a ride it's been. Beginning as England's biggest blues band in the late 1960s; losing two founding members to mental instability, one of them mid-tour to a religious cult; losing another member to a mental breakdown; adding female blues great Christine Perfect (later Christine McVie); becoming an Anglo-American multinational mainstream rock outfit with an ever-revolving door of musicians, some of whom only lasted for one or two albums; having legal troubles which saw the temporary formation and touring of an imposter version of the group; seeing a second, this time international, wave of success in the late 1970s; having two couples in the band break up mid-tour; and having so many different singers over the years that only a superfan could keep up with them all... like I said, it's been one hell of a ride. And that was a ridiculously long run-on sentence I just wrote, but I honestly needed one to properly account for this band's many, many undulations over its more than half century run.

1975's Fleetwood Mac, not to be confused with the earlier, retroactively renamed 1968 debut album Peter Green's Fleetwood Mac, ushered in the band's most successful period, adding guitarist Lindsey Buckingham and singer Stevie Nicks to the lineup and scoring strong chart successes in the U.S. and abroad. But it was the follow-up, 1977's Rumours, with which Fleetwood Mac would see their greatest ever success. Overcoming singularly serious turmoil within the group, the five members of Fleetwood Mac managed to produce a bona fide classic. I've been a fan of the band for a long time, initially discovering them in the mid 1990s via this album and subsequently delving head first into their back catalog. I enjoy listening to many of the group's deeper cuts and to most of their album releases going back to the very beginning. As such, I feel I'm qualified to comment on the sound of a remaster of Fleetwood Mac's most popular album. How does it fare when compared to the original 1984 CD release?

Second Hand News

Original 1984 CD release

Second Hand News

2004 CD remaster

Second Hand News

Dreams

Original 1984 CD release

Dreams

2004 CD remaster

Dreams

Never Going Back Again

Original 1984 CD release

Never Going Back Again

2004 CD remaster

Never Going Back Again

Don't Stop

Original 1984 CD release

Don't Stop

2004 CD remaster

Don't Stop

Go Your Own Way

Original 1984 CD release

Go Your Own Way

2004 CD remaster

Go Your Own Way

Songbird

Original 1984 CD release

Songbird

2004 CD remaster

Songbird

The Chain

Original 1984 CD release

The Chain

2004 CD remaster

The Chain

You Make Loving Fun

Original 1984 CD release

You Make Loving Fun

2004 CD remaster

You Make Loving Fun

I Don't Want to Know

Original 1984 CD release

I Don't Want to Know

2004 CD remaster

I Don't Want to Know

Oh Daddy

Original 1984 CD release

Oh Daddy

2004 CD remaster

Oh Daddy

Gold Dust Woman

Original 1984 CD release

Gold Dust Woman

2004 CD remaster

Gold Dust Woman

Silver Spring

2004 CD remaster

Silver Spring
And the winner is: 1984 original CD release. Well, this is the one, the CD from 2004 that a then co-worker let me borrow in its newly remastered, deluxe edition, the one that I referenced in the intro to my Album Comparisons home page. And now I'm going to go into just why this release is so disappointing relative to not only the earlier CD release, but even to the 1977 LP release as well. But first, the positives: First and foremost, the inclusion of "Silver Springs," which was undeservedly relegated to B-side status back in 197X, has finally been restored to its rightful place on the full album. The deluxe edition also includes a slew of additional bonus material in the form of outtakes, demos, and two "jam session" tracks which may be of interest.

Now, the negatives. "Silver Springs" has been inserted between "Songbird" and "The Chain," right at the side transition on the original LP, and not at the end where it should have been placed. This disrupts the original intended flow of the album, which, lest it be forgotten, was one the biggest-selling albums recorded by a group for some years following its release. It would seem that they did something right with the original running order, among other factors. Secondly, the bonus material, to be frank, consists of a collection of forgettable and at times dreary material that in my opinion was better left on the cutting room floor. I don't find the outtakes and demos to be of much interest as anything other than curiosities, and the "jam session" tracks are meandering at best and downright boring at worst. The bonus material often comes across sounding uninspired, at least to my ears, and isn't of sufficient quality or interest to warrant a listen unless you're a Fleetwood Mac completist.

Where the 2004 release really gets me, though, is in the mastering. This album just does not sound right to me. I should note that I am very familiar with Rumours, having been a huge Fleetwood Mac fan back in the day and possessing literally all the band's studio albums all the way back to 1968. I long ago lost count of the number of times I've listened to this, and having it both on original 1977 vinyl and the original CD release, I couldn't help but notice that things sounded notably less exciting the first time I listened to the remaster. At the time I couldn't articulate just why this was, but the difference was noticeable enough that my at the time untrained ears could pick up on it. Even before I was aware of the phenomenon of dynamic range compression on compact disc releases, I could still hear that something was wrong. And that speaks directly to why the remaster is the loser in this comparison.

Fleetwood Mac concert ticket, June 16, 2004